Entrepreneurship Theory
and Practice
Entrepreneurs
seek to create and exploit the opportunities. An ideology, opinions, and
behaviors that allow the production of future commodities and services in the
absence of existing markets for them constitute an entrepreneurial opportunity.
The discovery theory suggests
that Opportunities exist factually irrespective of entrepreneurs whereas the creation
theory of entrepreneurship explains that opportunities arise through individual
effort (Smith et
al., 2019). The purpose of this paper is to describe the
theories of entrepreneurship that underlie these two metaphors, the discovery,
and creation view of entrepreneurial opportunities. The paper will closely look
at the similarities as well as differences between these two entrepreneurial
opportunities. Meanwhile, the creation and discovery context of entrepreneurial
opportunities will be evaluated in this paper. Furthermore, the paper will also
investigate three firm-level strategies or capabilities that may efficiently
exploit the opportunities. Meanwhile, the paper will also discuss five
dimensions of entrepreneurial opportunities orientation before concluding and
providing reflection.
Entrepreneurial
Opportunities Discovery and Creation
Although entrepreneurship is a new
field, it can better be explained as the creation or invention of new
enterprises as well as evaluation, discovery, or exploitation of already
existing opportunities in the market. Entrepreneurship includes both inventions
as well as the discovery of new opportunities to make business processes
smoother and robust through the use of innovation and digital transformation. Entrepreneurial
opportunities are the ones that are being undertaken by a businessman to take
its business affairs to an even more robust position. These opportunities can
be found anywhere but in the recent world mostly entrepreneurs find these
opportunities mostly in digitization and technological advancements. As stated
by VU (2020), the artistic side of
creation and the entrepreneurial processes used to create economic value are
combined in innovation. The statement infers that innovation and digital
advancement are some of the major keys that can be seen in the opportunities
being undertaken by an entrepreneur. However, there are two main concepts about
these opportunities that are discovery and creation of entrepreneurial
opportunities. The discovery view of the entrepreneurial opportunities describes
that the opportunities are always there, one only has to find and implement
them in their business affairs. However,
on the other hand, the creation view of the opportunities explains that
opportunities are an innovative process and one must have worked hard to create
them to avail the opportunity.
There is a middle ground argument
being proposed in the long-running argument over whether entrepreneurial
possibilities are better regarded as factual, existing independently of
entrepreneurial effort, or personal, generated by the entrepreneur (Ramoglou &
Tsang, 2016).
Meanwhile, there is also a judgment and effectuation viewpoint of the
entrepreneurial opportunities of discovery and creation. However, both the
judgment and the effectuation viewpoints reject the existence of
opportunities that are not generated by entrepreneurial activity (Foss & Klein,
2017).
Furthermore Foss and Klein (2017), this does not entail extreme
subjectivism or social constructivism; in both perspectives, objective elements
like available resources, innovation, market preferences, and organizations
impact entrepreneurial creativity and largely decide to win and losing.
According to Busch and Barkema (2021), the process of
entrepreneurship takes place over time as businessmen try out different products
of the interplay, try to get around obstacles, change their strategies, and so
forth. The processes that create visible outcomes, such as whether businesses
earn revenues, attain personal gratification, or satisfy other goals, are made
up of the combination of internal cognitive variables, support plans, and
external constraining (Busch &
Barkema, 2021).
Many individuals miss out on opportunities because they are
not looking for them; nevertheless, entrepreneurs can perceive what anyone else
can not. They are positive, devoted, passionate, innovative, and imaginative in
a way that no one else is. Even though everyone is different, all entrepreneurs
share a similar goal: to generate value from existing or novel resources (Reuber et al.,
2018).
This implies that opportunities are always there, but one must have good
knowledge, motivation, and a creative mind to find out those opportunities.
However, the ultimate objective of seeking entrepreneurial opportunities is to
make a profit or earn revenue out of them. As stated by Foss & Klein (2020), opportunity recognition can
be defined in two different terms but the final objective is always the same;
there always exists an opportunity in the market as well as entrepreneurs
always tend to find or create a new opportunity for their business to earn or
maximize their revenues. This implies that every businessman looks for or
create opportunities just to increase its already existing capital or revenue.
Effective
Exploitation of Opportunities
All successful firms must begin
somewhere, and it is up to the businessman to uncover and develop their
thoughts. First, before a businessman can begin conceptualizing, one must
find, assess, and utilize these opportunities, which can be a lengthy process
of ideas and research, as well as obtaining the maximum value from them to
develop a successful company strategy. The process of designing a good or
service centered on a projected entrepreneurial opportunity, recruiting
relevant human capital, accumulating monetary capacity, and establishing the
firm is known as opportunity exploitation (Jones &
Barnir, 2019).
According to Rezvani et al. (2019), the very common way that an
entrepreneur uses to find out an opportunity is to find inefficiency in the
market. Furthermore, the entrepreneur always finds a way to turn that
inefficiency into opportunity and earn profit out of it (Rezvani et al.,
2019).
Given below are the firm-level strategies that an entrepreneur may use to
exploit opportunities out of the market.
Process
Innovation Strategy to Exploit Opportunities
Process or technological innovation
is one of the key factors being utilized by businesses to exploit opportunities
in the market. The ability of a firm to enhance its operations, bring new
improved services and goods to market, raise its productivity, and, most
crucially, boost its revenue relies on the effective exploitation of
novel concepts. As stated by Aksoy (2017), the ability of a firm to
enhance its operations, bring new improved services and goods to market,
raise its productivity, and, most crucially, boost its revenue relies on the
effective exploitation of novel concepts. The very main purpose of the
process innovation is to seek a competitive advantage within the market to
produce final goods for the company at the lowest possible cost (Distanont &
Khongmalai, 2020).
However, different firms equip themselves with technological advancement tools
to produce final goods of high quality in the lowest possible time.
The main objective of the process innovation at the firm
level is to create an innovative way to deliver refined goods and services (Möldner et al.,
2020).
The world has become more globalized and businesses are equipping themselves
with modern technologies to gain a competitive advantage in the market. In
order to survive in such a competitive environment, one must have to innovate
its process as well as find new ways through technological advancement to
exploit opportunities out of it. The very relative example of process
innovation and exploiting opportunities can be seen from Ocado corporation
which equipped its warehouses with the robotic technology to pick, grab, and
pack its products in minimal possible time (Vincent, 2018). This process innovation by
the Ocado group assisted the company to remain successful even in the time of the
Covid-19 pandemic-like situation. Thus, the firm managed to exploit
opportunities in a pandemic-like situation where almost every business in the
world is facing a drastic decline in terms of revenue.
Networking
and Exploiting Opportunities
Businesses collaborate with other
firms and companies to make themselves a firm position to survive in a competitive
market environment. A networking process is an opportunity to meet and engage
with other professional people or businesses to create contacts, ask for guidance,
and develop new skills (DHAMERIA et al.,
2021).
Furthermore, the key purpose of networking by a business is to exploit
opportunities within the market by collaborating with other firms such as
software firms to deal with various information technology processes. The
business comes across a networking process to avoid investing in a new venture
to save time and money (Anwar et al.,
2018).
This implies that businesses collaborate with other businesses to save time and
money. Meanwhile, networking also helps businesses in sharing ideas to process
something innovative or unique within the market. The apple corporation
collaborates with Taiwan semiconductor manufacturing company to produce A-series
and silicon chips for Apple products (Chiang, 2018).
Marketing
and Exploiting Opportunities
The business or entrepreneurs
exploit the market by utilizing marketing as its strategic tool. Marketing is
the method by which a business or an entrepreneur engages its
intended audience, develops solid relationships, and creates value to earn
profit or revenue for the firm (Kadekova &
Holienčinova, 2018).
Entrepreneurial marketing has to do with a marketing mentality that distinguishes
itself from conventional marketing techniques than it is about a specific
marketing method. Entrepreneurial marketing is more about creating
opportunities for the firms or their products to enter a more crowded market (Sadiku-Dushi et
al., 2019).
In short, firms or businesses do marketing to exploit or create opportunities
within the market.
Dimensions of
Entrepreneurial Orientation
Entrepreneurial orientation is
a management approach at the firm level that incorporates a firm's
entrepreneurial strategy-making procedures, management beliefs, and firm
behaviors (Wales et al., 2020). According to Lumpkin and Dess (1996), there is a total of five
dimensions through which firm-level entrepreneurial orientation can be examined:
Autonomy, risk-taking, innovativeness, proactiveness, and competitive
aggressiveness.
Autonomy
This dimension of entrepreneurial
orientation refers to how a person or a group of people inside an
institution has the flexibility to formulate and implement an
entrepreneurial initiative. According to Lumpkin and Dess (1996), individuals are given the
liberty they need to bring a fresh concept to completion in an
institute with high autonomy, free of the constraints of
business politics.
Risk-Taking
The tendency to engage in daring
rather than careful behaviors is referred to as risk-taking. The touch screen
smartphones being introduced by Apple Inc. in 2008 can be taken as one of the
risk-taking strategies (Cardoso, 2017). Thus, the introduction of
something completely new for Apple Inc. was a risk, but its CEO Steve Jobs
managed through his insightfulness and took the opportunity out of it.
Innovativeness
The propensity to explore
imagination and discovery is referred to as innovativeness. Certain
advancements rely on current skills to produce marginal changes, but more
revolutionary developments necessitate the acquisition of whole new skills,
which may render existing skills useless. Anyway, innovativeness is a process
of searching for new skills, creativeness, and technological advancements
within a work environment. The robotic installation of the Ocado group is a
very example of innovativeness to explore new opportunities (BBC, 2018).
Proactiveness
Proactiveness is the ability to
recognize and respond to future demands instead of responding to actions
as they arise. An opportunity-seeking mindset is the hallmark of a proactive
organization. Apple's initiative of introducing a touch screen is the best
example of proactiveness for an initiative rather than waiting for others to
try it first.
Competitive
Aggressiveness
This
dimension of the entrepreneurial orientation refers to the inclination to
confront opponents head-on instead of avoiding them. Price cuts and increased
advertising, reliability, and production capabilities are examples of
aggressive initiatives.
Self-Reflection
I will be utilizing the So What
reflection model by Professor Gary Rolfe and Colleagues to reflect on three
dimensions Risk-taking, competitive aggressiveness, and proactiveness of the
Entrepreneurial Orientation (EO).
What?
The three dimensions of EO talk
about taking initiatives to capture opportunities from within the market. The
basic purpose of the dimensions is to seek entrepreneurial opportunities by
utilizing different strategies. My understanding before coming through these
dimensions was the opposite. However, when I came across these dimensions and
related them to examples from different brands, my perception of
entrepreneurial opportunities has been changed.
So What?
I learned numerous new ways to seek
opportunities within a market structure. Meanwhile, I also learned that only
those entrepreneurs are successful who take risks, proactiveness, and
competitiveness aggressiveness to take initiatives.
Now What?
In the future, I will ensure that I
will utilize all the skills that I have learned from the dimensions of
entrepreneurial opportunities. Meanwhile, I will try to adopt a risk-lover
strategy but be risk-averse.
Conclusion
The goal of this research was to
describe the entrepreneurship theories that underpin these two metaphors of
entrepreneurial opportunity finding and development. The parallels and
contrasts between these two entrepreneurial prospects were also examined in depth
in the report. Meanwhile, this article examines the backdrop of entrepreneurial
opportunity development and discovery. In addition, the research looked into
three firm-level tactics or competencies that may be used to effectively utilize
the prospects. The report examined five elements of entrepreneurial
opportunities orientation before ending and providing reflection.
References
Aksoy, H. (2017). How do innovation
culture, marketing innovation, and product innovation affect the market
performance of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs)? Technology in
Society, 51(4), 133–141.
Anwar,
M., Rehman, A. U., & Shah, S. Z. A. (2018). Networking and new venture’s
performance: Mediating role of competitive advantage. International Journal
of Emerging Markets.
Busch,
C., & Barkema, H. (2021). From necessity to opportunity: Scaling bricolage
across resource‐constrained environments. Strategic Management
Journal, 42(4), 741–773.
Cardoso,
E. A. R. P. (2017). Examining the differences of the internationalization
strategies of two of the major brands in the smartphone industry-Apple inc.
Versus Samsung electronics.
Chiang,
M.-H. (2018). Taiwan’s Economy in 2017: Boosted by Apple’s Great Appetite. East
Asian Policy, 10(01), 92–104.
DHAMERIA,
V., HIDAYAT, A., GHOZALI, I., & ARYANTO, V. D. W. (2021). Networking
Capability, Entrepreneurial Marketing, Competitive Advantage, and Marketing
Performance: A Case Study of Embroidery SMEs in Indonesia. The Journal of
Asian Finance, Economics, and Business, 8(6), 319–326.
Distanont,
A., & Khongmalai, O. (2020). The role of innovation in creating a
competitive advantage. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 41(1),
15–21.
Foss,
N. J., & Klein, P. G. (2017). Entrepreneurial Discovery or Creation? In
Search of the Middle Ground. Academy of Management Review, 42(4),
733–736. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2016.0046
Foss,
N. J., & Klein, P. G. (2020). Entrepreneurial opportunities: Who needs
them? Academy of Management Perspectives, 34(3), 366–377.
Jones,
R. J., & Barnir, A. (2019). Properties of opportunity creation and
discovery: Comparing variation in contexts of innovativeness. Technovation,
79, 1–10.
Kadekova,
Z., & Holienčinova, M. (2018). Influencer marketing is a modern phenomenon
creating a new frontier of virtual opportunities. Communication Today, 9(2).
Lumpkin,
G. T., & Dess, G. G. (1996). Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation
construct and linking it to performance. Academy of Management Review, 21(1),
135–172.
Möldner,
A. K., Garza-Reyes, J. A., & Kumar, V. (2020). Exploring lean manufacturing
practices’ influence on process innovation performance. Journal of Business
Research, 106, 233–249.
Ramoglou,
S., & Tsang, E. W. (2016). A realist perspective of entrepreneurship:
Opportunities as propensities. Academy of Management Review, 41(3),
410–434.
Reuber,
A. R., Knight, G. A., Liesch, P. W., & Zhou, L. (2018). International
entrepreneurship: The pursuit of entrepreneurial opportunities across national
borders. Springer.
Rezvani,
M., Lashgari, M., & Farsi, J. Y. (2019). International entrepreneurial
alertness in opportunity discovery for market entry. Journal of Research in
Marketing and Entrepreneurship.
Sadiku-Dushi,
N., Dana, L.-P., & Ramadani, V. (2019). Entrepreneurial marketing
dimensions and SMEs performance. Journal of Business Research, 100,
86–99.
Smith,
A. W., Moghaddam, K., & Lanivich, S. E. (2019). A set‐theoretic
investigation into the origins of creation and discovery opportunities. Strategic
Entrepreneurship Journal, 13(1), 75–92.
The
Ocado robot swarms that pack your shopping. (2018, May 8). BBC News.
https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-43968495
Vincent,
J. (2018, May 8). Welcome to the automated warehouse of the future. The
Verge.
https://www.theverge.com/2018/5/8/17331250/automated-warehouses-jobs-ocado-andover-amazon
VU,
H. M. (2020). A review of dynamic capabilities, innovation capabilities,
entrepreneurial capabilities, and their consequences. The Journal of Asian
Finance, Economics, and Business, 7(8), 485–494.
Wales,
W. J., Covin, J. G., & Monsen, E. (2020). Entrepreneurial orientation: The
necessity of a multilevel conceptualization. Strategic Entrepreneurship
Journal, 14(4), 639–660.
No comments:
Post a Comment